Skip to content

Journal of Plastic, Breast & Reconstructive Surgery·Peer-reviewed · Open access

JPBRS
Case report

Case 5 (2024): Reconstruction of lower right eyelid using a combined tarsoconjunctival flap, temporal fascial turn-over flap, transposition flap and full-thickness skin graft

Annika Gotholt Hansen (StudMed)1, Magnus Balslev Avnstorp1, Jørgen Hesselfelt1

  1. 1Roskilde, SUH, Denmark
Published March 31, 20243 views9 min read
Lentigo maligna melanomaLower eyelidHughes tarsoconjunctival flaptemporal fascial turn-over flaptransposition flapfull-thickness skin graft.
Export:RISBibTeX

Abstract

A 73-year-old woman was referred to the Department of Plastic Surgery by her local dermatologist with lentigo maligna melanoma localized under her right eye, measuring 30×20 mm. The patient was initially diagnosed in 2011 with lentigo maligna and experienced recurrences in 2016, 2019, and again in 2022 with lentigo maligna melanoma. The diagnosis was confirmed by histological analysis of a punch b

Case 5 (2024): Reconstruction of lower right eyelid using a combined tarsoconjunctival flap, temporal fascial turn-over flap, transposition flap and full-thickness skin graft
AfterBeforeBeforeAfter
Drag to compare before & after

A 73-year-old woman was referred to the Department of Plastic Surgery by her local dermatologist with lentigo maligna melanoma localized under her right eye, measuring 30×20 mm. The patient was initially diagnosed in 2011 with lentigo maligna and experienced recurrences in 2016, 2019, and again in 2022 with lentigo maligna melanoma. The diagnosis was confirmed by histological analysis of a punch biopsy (lentigo maligna melanoma recurrences 0.9 mm thick without ulceration and without dermal mitoses). Pre-existing conditions include Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), asthma, AFib, acute kidney injury, chronic ischemic heart disease, rheumatic aortic valve stenosis, hypercholesterolemia, heart failure, mitral valve insufficiency, type A aortic dissection, and bone marrow transplantation. Currently, she was medicated with Potassium chloride, Apixaban, Digoxin, Furosemide, Enalapril, Atorvastatin, Sulfamethoxazole + Trimethoprim, Ruxolitinib, Alendronate, and Fluticasone.

Step 1 — Lentigo maligna melanoma excision and reconstruction using a cheek rotation flap
Lentigo maligna melanoma excision and reconstruction using a cheek rotation flap

An excision of lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) was performed, followed by closure using a local rotational flap from the right cheek, under local anesthesia (LA). The lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) was located on the right cheek but extended to the lower eyelid, stretching around the lateral canthus to the upper lateral eyelid. The excision was performed with a 10 mm safety margin at an appropriate depth from the musculature. Safety margins were maintained laterally, medially, and caudally as far as possible, but due to functional reasons, it was not possible towards the edge of the eyelid.

2
Step 2 — Histology, re-excision, and a new plan with reconstruction using combined flaps
Histology, re-excision, and a new plan with reconstruction using combined flaps

The histology results showed lentigo maligna melanoma, recurrent. The tumor thickness was 1.3 mm, with dermal mitoses. There were no clear resection margins, with skin involvement seen on both sides. As a result, re-excision with an additional 1 cm margin + sentinel node procedure on the neck was indicated. A new re-excision was planned. Due to the location, re-excision with a 5 mm margin was approved, including the entire limbal edge corresponding to the right lower eyelid, followed by reconstruction using a tarsoconjunctival flap, temporal fascial turnover flap, temporal transposition flap and full-thickness skin graft. Lentigo maligna melanoma re-excision: After identifying the excision area, the LMM was removed with a 5 mm safety margin, ensuring appropriate depth to the fascia and tarsal plate.

3
Step 3 — Reconstruction with Tarsoconjunctival flap. (Hughes tarsoconjuctival flap)
Reconstruction with Tarsoconjunctival flap. (Hughes tarsoconjuctival flap)

The operation continued with a tarsoconjunctival flap, measuring 2 cm in width, harvested from the upper eyelid, and sutured with Vicryl 4.0 rapid to the conjunctiva on the lower eyelid.

4
Step 4 — Reconstruction with temporalis fascia turnover flap and a temporalis skin transposition flap
Reconstruction with temporalis fascia turnover flap and a temporalis skin transposition flap

The incision was extended laterally into the temporal region, where a 3 cm long temporal fascia was raised/turned. This flap was flipped over and divided into two flaps, forming both the upper and lower limbal edges by suturing them to the remaining medial upper and lower tarsal plates. Laterally, the flap was anchored at the canthus. Superiorly, the skin was reconstructed using a transposition flap from the forehead.

5
Step 5 — Reconstruction with transposition flap, undermining and full-thickness skin graft
Reconstruction with transposition flap, undermining and full-thickness skin graft

Inferiorly, on the cheek, the defect was closed directly after subdermal undermining. This left a clean defect on the lower eyelid of 35×20 mm, with a nice round look imitating the contours of the lower eyelid, which had to be covered with a full-thickness skin graft. The graft was harvested from the right clavicle and sutured to the lower right eyelid margin with nylon 5.0, and the lower limbal edge was sutured with vicryl rapid. Additionally, Jelonet and gauze were applied at the site. Closure has been performed with nylon 5-0 in the skin and flaps throughout the face. Closure on the right clavicle was done with Monosyn 4-0 inverted sutures and intracutaneous sutures. The operation lasted 178 minutes.

6
Step 6 — Two days postoperative
Two days postoperative

The patient remained admitted to the department for the next two days with unpacking on the second day. The surgery and the postoperative period were uncomplicated, and the patient was discharged on day 2 for a calm recovery at home.

7
Step 7 — Suture removal, day 7 postoperatively
Suture removal, day 7 postoperatively

The dressing over the graft was removed, revealing an acceptable result. Loose scabs and sutures were removed, and a thin piece of gauze was applied, secured with micropore.

8
Step 8 — Follow-up
Follow-up

Histological findings revealed no free margin at 3-5 o’clock, with residual in situ melanoma present. The location corresponded to the medial lower right eyelid. At that time, the patient was scheduled for a division of the tarsoconjunctival flap. It was planned that during this operation, re-excision at a 5 mm safety margin could be performed, securing free margins. Alternatively, local oncological or dermatological treatment was considered.

9
Step 9 — Division of the tarsoconjunctival flap
Division of the tarsoconjunctival flap

In GA, division of the tarsoconjunctival flap and re-excision of in situ melanoma were performed. Excision: The area was marked for excision with a 5mm margin. Subsequently, local anesthesia with Marcaine and adrenaline was administered. Excision was performed corresponding to the 3-5 o’clock positions, with a small rim of conjunctiva included. The skin was then closed directly with Surgipro 6-0 single knots. Division: The lower eyelids of the two eyes were evaluated for symmetry. Division of the tarsoconjunctival flap was performed using a knife and Stevens scissors and the eye protected using a metal cutting guide. Conjunctiva was sutured forward onto the lower eyelid with 6-0 single sutures, long, which were bent downwards towards the cheek. Corresponding to the upper eyelid, the remaining part of the skin from the skin graft was excised. Finally, the area was bandaged with Micropore and dry gauze.

10
Step 10 — Suture removal
Suture removal

Suture removal followed division of the tarsoconjunctival flap and re-excision of in situ melanoma corresponding to the medial right lower eyelid. The patient experienced pain in the right eye following the surgery. It was assessed that this was due to irritation from threads that had been present inside the eye. Objectively, there was slight swelling but no signs of infection. The flap appeared with pleasing colors and good capillary response.

11
Step 11 — 3 months follow-up

Good postoperative result with intact reconstruction . However, a functional issue arose where the patient couldn’t fully see laterally towards the right side due to the thickness of the flap and the stitching being slightly more medial towards the eye. Consideration could be given to correcting the flap; however, it is too early for that, so the patient will be seen for a follow-up appointment in another 3 months. It is recommended to wait a minimum of 9-12 months before correction to achieve the best possible result.

The patient was advised to keep the head elevated and avoid hot drinks and foods the following 24-48 hours. A calm regimen was recommended until suture removal, with particular emphasis on avoiding exhausting physical activities including sports and cleaning. Analgesia could be managed by the patient with up to 4 x 1g of paracetamol per day. Seven days after the operation, the patient underwent suture removal and evaluation of the reconstruction. Following the first re-excision, the patient was started on tablet treatment with erythromycin 500 mg twice daily for 5 days prophylactically, and after the second re-excision, the patient started treatment with eye drops (fusidic acid) four times daily for 3 days.

How to cite this article

Annika Gotholt Hansen (StudMed), Magnus Balslev Avnstorp, Jørgen Hesselfelt. Case 5 (2024): Reconstruction of lower right eyelid using a combined tarsoconjunctival flap, temporal fascial turn-over flap, transposition flap and full-thickness skin graft. Journal of Plastic, Breast & Reconstructive Surgery. 2024.

Open access. © 2024 The Author(s). Published by the Journal of Plastic, Breast & Reconstructive Surgery. Copyright to this case is shared between the author(s) and the journal; authors may reuse their own case for education, presentations and social media.

Keep reading

Related cases

All cases
Case 20 2026: Staged Excision and Delayed Primary Closure of a large Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Anterior Scalp

Case 20 2026: Staged Excision and Delayed Primary Closure of a large Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Anterior Scalp

Mikkel Halborg Sørensen, Nanja Gotland Sundstrup, Christian Lyngsaa Lang

Keywords: Basal cell carcinoma, scalp reconstruction, staged excision, primary closure, scalp biomechanics. Authors: Mikkel Halborg Sørensen, MD; Nanja Gotland Sundstrup, MD; Christian Lyngsaa Lang, MD. Institution: Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hos-pital, Denmark Abstract A 48-year-old woman was referred with a non-radically excised nodular basal cell carcinoma of the anterior scalp complicated by wound infection and dehiscence. Re-excision with 3 mm margins to the galea was performed under local anesthesia. Given local inflammation and uncertain margin status, delayed reconstruction was planned pending histopathological confirmation. After clear margins were verified, controlled subgaleal undermining allowed tension-reduced primary closure. This staged strategy ensured oncologic safety while preserving hair-bearing scalp and avoiding unnecessary flap reconstruction. Patient medical history A 48-year-old woman was referred after incomplete excision of a nodular basal cell carcinoma (nBCC) of the anterior scalp performed in private plastic surgery practice. Histology demonstrated tumor involvement of the lateral margins, while the deep margin was free of tumor. Postoperatively, wound rupture and infection developed. Microbiology showed sparse growth of Staphylococcus aureus, and antibiotic therapy was initiated. The patient was otherwise non-smoking and healthy, with well-treated asthma, as her only relevant comorbidity. Before and After Patient examination Clinical examination revealed a 22 × 19 mm anterior scalp defect with limited perifocal erythema and minimal purulent discharge. No regional lymphadenopathy was palpable. Pre-operative considerations Initial histopathology demonstrated nodular basal cell carcinoma with focal lateral margin involvement and a clear deep margin, without perineural invasion or other high-risk features. In accordance with current recommendations for low-risk BCC, re-excision with 3 mm c

202656
Case 22 2026: Superior Gluteal vessel: A rarely used recipient for free flap reconstruction of lumbosacral defects: a case report.

Case 22 2026: Superior Gluteal vessel: A rarely used recipient for free flap reconstruction of lumbosacral defects: a case report.

Tushar Dutta, Arun PS, Swati Sattavan

Keywords: Superior gluteal vessel, free flap reconstruction, lumbosacral defects Authors: 1. Tushar Dutta, Consultant Plastic Surgeon; 2. Arun PS, Consultant Surgical Oncologist; 3. Swati Sattavan, Consultant Surgical Oncologist; Institute: State Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India Abstract Lumbosacral defects that are too large for local flap reconstruction should be considered for microvascular free tissue transfer. However, lack of suitable recipient vessels in the area makes the task technically difficult. Options such as thoracodorsal and inferior gluteal vessels extended with vein grafts and AV loops have been described. Each option has its own drawbacks. Despite having a short course at its origin, the superior gluteal vessel is a viable alternative. We describe here a case where the vessel was dissected out with adequate length and used as a recipient for free flap reconstruction. Patient medical history The patient was a 41-year-old lady with no known comorbidities. She presented to us with a large lumbosacral mass that had been growing for one year. Before visiting our center, she had been operated twice at other institutions and had recurrences after each occasion. During the last three months the mass had started to grow rapidly and caused ulceration. There was no pain or fever. There was no neurological involvement of lower limbs. Patient had an ECOG status 1. Before and After Patient examination A 17x 22 cm mass was noted encompassing the left part of lumbosacral region and crossing the midline to the opposite side. The superior limit of the lesion was at the L3 vertebra and inferior extent was near the coccyx. Skin ulceration was noted at the center of the mass. On palpation, the mass was warm to touch, hard in consistency and immobile. Skin was fixed and fixity was also noted to the underlying muscle. No tenderness was elicited. Surrounding possible donor sites for flap harvest showed no scars. Pre-operative considerations Preoperative biopsy co

202621
Case 23 2026: “Minimally Invasive Finger Amputation Using a Volar ‘Toilet seat’ Flap for Invasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma”

Case 23 2026: “Minimally Invasive Finger Amputation Using a Volar ‘Toilet seat’ Flap for Invasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma”

Claes Hannibal Killerich, Nikolaj Warming

Keywords: Squamous cell carcinoma; finger amputation; volar flap; local reconstruction; traction neurectomy; hand surgery. Authors: Claes Hannibal Killerich, Nikolaj Warming Abstract A 93-year-old woman presented with a chronic non-healing dorsal finger wound initially diagnosed as actinic keratosis. Repeat biopsy revealed invasive squamous cell carcinoma with joint and bone involvement. Due to the extent of invasion, distal amputation of the third finger was required. Reconstruction was performed using a volar “toilet seat” flap under digital nerve block to minimize surgical burden. The procedure achieved clear margins, preserved stump length, and avoided donor-site morbidity. This case highlights the importance of early re-biopsy of non-healing lesions and adapting surgical strategy to patient age, function, and comorbidity. Patient medical history A 93-year-old woman presented with a wound on the dorsal aspect of the proximal phalanx of the left third finger. A primary biopsy revealed actinic keratosis, and the lesion was treated several times with curettage and electrodesiccation by a private dermatologist. Despite repeated treatments under professional supervision, the wound failed to heal.Due to the persistent non-healing nature of the lesion, a repeat biopsy was performed, confirming the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The patient was referred to the Department of Plastic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, where a primary excision was performed with a 7 mm surgical margin. Histopathological examination demonstrated invasive tumor growth involving both joint and bone. The defect was subsequently reconstructed using a full-thickness skin graft. Before and After Patient examination The left third finger showed a healed full-thickness skin graft on the dorsal aspect of the proximal phalanx, covering the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. There was no visible residual tumor, and no palpable lymphadenopathy in the left cubital fossa or axillary re

202630